Tavere

Free Case Evaluation

510-255-4646
  • Home
  • About Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Testimonials
  • Attorney
  • Blog
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • General Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Bankruptcy Law
    • Bankruptcy News
    • Types of Debt in Bankruptcy
      • Bay Area Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Contact Us
Stop Worrying About Your Debt

A Better Tomorrow

Starting Today

Stop Worrying About your Debt.
Call us Now to Take the First Step.

Click Here
Millions in debt discharged for our clients

Real Concern

Real Help

Millions in debt Discharged
For our Clients. Call Today, let us Help!

Click Here

Growing Split Among Circuit Courts About Exculpation Under Chapter 11

Admin on November 18, 2022 Posted in Bankruptcy Law, Blog

Countless Chapter 11 reorganization plans include provisions acknowledging the release of claims connected to stakeholders in bankruptcy cases. Excluded from this, however, are claims that allege various types of misconduct like bad faith, gross negligence, or fraud. These exculpatory statements are a valuable tool in motivating parties to play a role in bankruptcy cases without concern of facing subsequent litigation for their behavior.

In the recent case of Nexpoint Advisors v. Highland Capital Management, the Fifth Circuit contributed to the ongoing split among circuit courts concerning the existing scope of exculpation clauses.

The 3rd and the 9th Circuit Courts have directly affirmed the use of wide-ranging exculpation statements in confirmed reorganization plans, while the 5th and 10th Circuit Courts have come to the opposite conclusion and held that the Bankruptcy Code’s Section 524(e) states that a debtor’s discharge does not impact another party’s responsibility for a debt. Additionally, the bankruptcy code often prohibits these clauses except in situations where express authority allowing exculpation can be located somewhere else in the Bankruptcy Code.

Highland Capital Management Case

Highland Capital Management began a Chapter 11 case after it collected various liabilities including unpaid judgments. While proceeding through the bankruptcy process, a committee of creditors agreed to a settlement agreement with the co-founder of Highland. Under the agreement, Highland’s creator agreed to stop serving as a director and officer of the company, and a board of directors was selected to function as quasi-trustees to look over the company. 

In what bankruptcy courts classified as a “nasty” split, the company’s creator began to object to bankruptcy settlement, appeal orders, and disrupt the company’s management. Consequently, the bankruptcy court classified the man as a “serial litigator.” 

In 2020, the Independent Directors of Highland filed a Chapter 11 reorganization plan, which included boilerplate language releasing the stakeholders from claims based on activity arising out of the case’s filing and administration. The provision also excluded either acts or omissions involving misconduct.

The 5th Circuit Court’s Holding

The bankruptcy court later certified a direct appeal made to the 5th Circuit, which agreed that the exculpation clause was impermissibly wide. Instead, the 5th Circuit argued that the case should have only been restricted to the fiduciaries of the bankruptcy estate. Additionally, the 5th Circuit Court of appeals held that the exculpation clause should have excluded entities who ordinarily would be included in such a provision.

The 5th Circuit started its decision by considering the Bankruptcy Code Section 524(e), which states that the discharge of a debtor’s debt does not impact the liability of any other entity on or the property of any other entity for any debt.

The court then determined that Section 524(e) prohibits third-party exculpations without express authority in another Bankruptcy Code provision. Determining that no basis existed for including the other parties involved in the bankruptcy case, the 5th Circuit determined that the Exculpation Provision only applies to Highland, the Committee, the Committee’s members, and the Independent Directors. The 5th Circuit determined that the Bankruptcy Code offers limited qualified immunity to both the Committee and Independent Directors.

Do Not Hesitate to Speak with a Bankruptcy Lawyer

If you or a loved one is pursuing a bankruptcy discharge, you should not hesitate to speak with a skilled bankruptcy attorney. Do not hesitate to contact lawyer Melanie Tavare today to schedule a free case evaluation. 

Recent Posts

  • Filing for Bankruptcy Individually vs. Jointly: The Advantages and Disadvantages

    Filing for bankruptcy is an important decision to make, and it can be further complicated when you are married and considering filing joint

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

  • How Long Does Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Take?

    When it comes to filing for bankruptcy, the process can be daunting, especially when you do not understand how it works and have no idea wh

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

  • Pitfalls to Avoid When Filing for Bankruptcy

    Filing for bankruptcy is a difficult and overwhelming decision to make. As you work through the process of filing, it is important to know

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

  • When Can You Start to Rebuild Credit After Bankruptcy?

    Filing for bankruptcy can be a tough financial decision. It can also have a long-lasting impact on your credit rating, making it hard to op

    category : Blog, Rebuilding Credit

search this year

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • Search by Year

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • img

    Quick Links

    • Bay Area Bankruptcy Attorney
    • About Firm
    • Practice Areas
    • Attorney
    • Communities Served
    • FAQ
    • Disclaimer
    • Contact Us

    Follow Us

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google
    • Yelp

    Contact Us

    • Oakland Office

      1300 Clay St. Suite 600
      Oakland, CA 94612

    • Hayward Office

      24301 Southland Dr.
      STE. 310
      Hayward, CA 94545

    • 510 255 4646

    We serve the following localities: Alameda County, Alameda, Berkeley, Castro Valley, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, Oakland, San Leandro, Union City, Contra Costa County, Antioch, Brentwood, Concord, Martinez, Pittsburg, Richmond, Walnut Creek, San Francisco County, San Francisco, Albany, Ashland, Dublin, Emeryville, Newark, Pleasanton, San Lorenzo, and Alamo.


    The Law Offices of Melanie Tavare is a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code


    |

    2022 © Copyright law office of Melanie Tavare