Tavere

Free Case Evaluation

510-255-4646
  • Home
  • About Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Testimonials
  • Attorney
  • Blog
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • General Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Bankruptcy Law
    • Bankruptcy News
    • Types of Debt in Bankruptcy
      • Bay Area Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Contact Us
Stop Worrying About Your Debt

A Better Tomorrow

Starting Today

Stop Worrying About your Debt.
Call us Now to Take the First Step.

Click Here
Millions in debt discharged for our clients

Real Concern

Real Help

Millions in debt Discharged
For our Clients. Call Today, let us Help!

Click Here

Recent Ninth Circuit Case Illustrates the Importance of Good Faith in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan

wpadmin on November 23, 2013 Posted in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

A recent case from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel illustrates the importance of good faith for a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan. Good faith is an essential element for a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy filer to have their plan approved and to begin repaying their debts. Good faith is not defined in the bankruptcy code, but if a filer is dishonest in disclosing assets and liabilities, or makes misrepresentations in their plan, they will likely not be in good faith.

A little background on how debt is treated in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy:

A person who files for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy puts together a plan, based on their income, for how they will pay their secured and unsecured debts. Secured debts are those debts for which there is a property interest as collateral (such as a house or a car), whereas an unsecured debt is not backed by collateral. With a few exceptions, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy allows filers to split their secured debt into secured and unsecured portions when they owe more than the value of an asset. A chapter 13 bankruptcy filer has to pay off all of their secured debts if they want to keep the property, but the amount of unsecured debt they are required to pay depends on their income, how long their plan lasts, and the total amount of their unsecured debt.

In re Hardcastle:

This difference in how Chapter 13 Bankruptcy treats secured and unsecured debt is at issue in In re Hardcastle.

The Hardcastles, who declared Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, had two mortgages on their residence. Because the value of their residence was less than the first mortgage, they filed a motion to value the second mortgage at $0. The court granted their motion and valued the second mortgage at $0, ordering that the Bank of America’s claim on the second mortgage be treated as an unsecured claim. However, two months later Bank of America filed a secured proof of claim. The Hardcastles, in what the Ninth Circuit viewed as not in good faith, filed a second bankruptcy plan that did not include Bank of America as either a secured creditor or an unsecured creditor. Instead, they used their disposable income (that would have gone to paying Bank of America) to pay 100 percent of the claims of their other unsecured creditors. They also increased their proposed living expenses.

When the court denied their plan, the Hardcastles appealed, arguing that Bank of America submitted a proof of claim as a secured creditor for a $0.0 claim, and thus should not receive any payment. The Ninth Circuit held that the bankruptcy court, in its earlier order, had directed the Hardcastles to treat the claim as unsecured, and that the Hardcastles had manipulated the bankruptcy system in omitting Bank of America from their plan.

The Law Offices of Melanie Tavare is a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code

Recent Posts

  • What Can You Do if You Cannot Keep Up With Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan Payments?

    If you filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy but are struggling to keep up with the payments outlined in your debt repayment plan, you may not kn

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

  • What is a Means Test and How Does it Work?

    When considering filing for bankruptcy, one of the most important steps is the means test. This test evaluates your financial situation to

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

  • When Should I Stop Using My Credit Card Before Bankruptcy?

    Filing for bankruptcy is a difficult decision and one that should not be taken lightly. But if you have already made the decision to file,

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

  • Can Filing for Bankruptcy Stop an Eviction?

    Facing eviction can be a stressful and difficult experience. If you are considering filing for bankruptcy to stop an eviction, there are ce

    category : Bankruptcy Law, Blog

search this year

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • Search by Year

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • img

    Quick Links

    • Bay Area Bankruptcy Attorney
    • About Firm
    • Practice Areas
    • Attorney
    • Communities Served
    • FAQ
    • Disclaimer
    • Contact Us

    Follow Us

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google
    • Yelp

    Contact Us

    • Oakland Office

      1300 Clay St. Suite 600
      Oakland, CA 94612

    • Hayward Office

      24301 Southland Dr.
      STE. 310
      Hayward, CA 94545

    • 510 255 4646

    We serve the following localities: Alameda County, Alameda, Berkeley, Castro Valley, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, Oakland, San Leandro, Union City, Contra Costa County, Antioch, Brentwood, Concord, Martinez, Pittsburg, Richmond, Walnut Creek, San Francisco County, San Francisco, Albany, Ashland, Dublin, Emeryville, Newark, Pleasanton, San Lorenzo, and Alamo.


    The Law Offices of Melanie Tavare is a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code


    Concord, California Bankruptcy Attorney Melanie Tavare Home | Contact Pittsburg, California Foreclosure Defense Lawyer Melanie Tavare

    2022 © Copyright law office of Melanie Tavare